Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 25, Hemisphere Specialization

Greetings, Friendlies. :) Hemisphere Specialization. The idea that the left and right brain hemispheres have different structural and functional roles, and that these differences are manifest in our lived experience. You’ve probably heard this kind of thing before: “artists are right-brained, analysts are left-brained”. That’s actually not accurate, that artists are right-brained and analysts are […]

Categories
Discourse Scholarship

PPP, Part 24, Avijjā Revisited

Greetings, Friendlies. :) Just before the PPP, I wrote about Avijjā (mis-understanding) as the polestar of practice and offered an interpretation of the term. Though the general shape is the same I’d like to offer today’s, maybe more nuanced(?), understanding: First: the concept of Avijjā is empty. How we understand it at any point depends […]

Categories
Discourse

PPP, Part 23, Implicit Bias

Greetings, Friendlies. :) Is a post on Implicit Bias superfluous? (Is opening a blog post with a rhetorical question superfluous?) Everyone knows what Implicit Bias is. And it’s clear how it ties in with the interpreter module and the construction of human experience. Right? I dunno. There was a time when I wouldn’t have used […]

Categories
Discourse Engaged Dharma

Yes. You and I Can Make a Difference.

Greetings, Friendlies. :) Recently a friend was expressing… shall we say… “dissatisfaction” regarding “events” taking place in Washington DC. I empathize. My friend lamented, “There’s nothing we can do.” I disagree. And in the spirit of Silly T-shirt Friday, would like to highlight some do-good merch. Many of us in the dhamma take a more […]

Categories
DharmaPhD

DPhD On Retreat

Greetings, Friendlies. :) I’ll be on retreat 14FEB-02MAR. Posts are scheduled out, but I won’t be responding ’til March. Keep your chinny-chin-chins up, 🌻

Categories
Discourse

PPP, Part 22, Angry-Femme IM and the Threefold Training

Greetings, Friendlies! Last time I TMI’d you with the Angry-Femme Interpreter Module. Thanks for holding that. :) Re-mixing the same with the Reactivity and Threefold Training stuff from Part 19. The angry-feminist view has been known to cause a ruckus. Even when not manifesting behaviorally, it can lead to a lot of internal dukkha. Hypervigilance, […]

Categories
Discourse

PPP, Part 21, My Angry-Femme Interpreter Module, An Introduction

Greetings, Friendlies! Last time we looked at how the Interpreter Module (IM) uses not just individual pieces of information but also views and narratives when constructing the world. My IM wears some pretty thick angry-feminist goggles. And fair enough. I’m 5’4 (162cm), small framed, and for many decades, kind of adorable. I’ve worked in construction, […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 20, DhP 1:1 and the Interpreter Module

Greetings, Friendlies. :) All experience is preceded by the Interpreter ModuleLed by the Interpreter ModuleMade by the Interpreter Module#FakeBuddhaQuotes Imagine: you have volunteered for a scientific study. You arrive at the lab and the affable experimenter explains they are studying social interactions. They would like to apply theatrical makeup to your right cheek, in such […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 19, On Reactivity

Greetings, Friendlies! Could it be that Skillfulness, at least in some part, is an overcoming of reactivity? “Reactivity” is not a translation of a Pāli word, so less concern about heresy; was Stephen Batchelor the first to use it in a dhammic sense? Dunno. It might be useful at times to differentiate between neuro-biological reactivity […]

Categories
Meta Teaching

This Saturday, 18JAN, Akincano Weber, Grounding in Conflict

The power of grounding in times of inner and outer conflict.

Categories
Discourse

PPP, Part 18, On Skillfulness

Greetings, Friendlies. :) I currently prefer translating “kusala” as “skillful”. That’s fine. Inoffensive. Secular. But what, I wondered, do I actually mean when I say “skillful”? [1] Let’s start with a little semiotic premise in case Stephen Batchelor ever reads this (jokes! I have jokes!): words in common language do not have absolute definitions. That’s […]

Categories
DharmaPhD

Yet Another Hindrance Talk, Part 2

Greetings, Friendlies. :) The feedback was so good from the first Hindrance practice talk that I’ve rejiggered and will give it another go: Tuesday, 14JAN, 1000 Pacific. If you’re interested, please send word for the zoom. (If we aren’t already in touch via email you can use the contact form here). May you not have […]

Categories
Discourse

PPP, Part 17, Saṅkhāra-ing? Fabricating?

Greetings, Friendlies. :) I notice I’ve started using the word “Fabricating”, which I inherited from Rob Burbea. I think (though I’m not certain) he’s talking about the fact of our minds fabricating/constructing experience, from the grossest levels of full-blown papanca all the way down to the subtlest levels of subconscious conceptualizing. And I think this […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 16, Simple Knowing, The Interpreter Module, Saṅkhāra-ing/Fabrication

Greetings, Friendlies. :) Following on from our description of Simple Knowing… In The Social Brain (and in Who’s In Charge?) Gazzaniga recounts an experience illustrating the interpreter module doing its thing on top of basic sensory input. We might say Saṅkhāra-ing/Fabrication in action. Remember how, for Split-Brain Patients, you can present information to one hemisphere […]

Categories
cognitive science DharmaPhD Discourse Practice

PPP, Part 15, Simple Knowing

Greetings, Friendlies. :) In some dhamma traditions a type of bhavana (cultivation/meditation) is practiced that goes by names like Bare Attention, Open Awareness, Choiceless Awareness. Presently I prefer Christina Feldman’s “Simple Knowing”. From her book Mindfulness: a way of attending where no judgment or narrative is added to the experience of the moment. A thought […]

Categories
Discourse Meta Teaching

CittaHindranceKhandha Talk (aka All of Human Experience)

I’ll be giving another class report 06JAN, 1000 Pacific. Would love to have you. :

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 14, The Interpreter Module, Questions

Greetings, Friendlies! Though enormously enthusiastic about the idea of an Interpreter Module, there are plenty of unanswered questions. I present these as-is, as placeholders and acknowledgment of the current state of my understanding: And there we are. Your thoughts? Other questions/concerns?

Categories
cognitive science DharmaPhD Discourse

PPP, Part 13, Interpreter Module, Avijjā, Saṅkhāra

Greetings, Friendlies. :) What happens if we take the Interpreter Module, Avijjā (as mis-understanding how our minds work), and Saṅkhāra (as “principle of construction“), and puzzle-piece them together? At least one arrangement gives us an Interpreter Module which is receiving information that is, at best, limited and conditioned, at worst, inaccurate or grossly incomplete (Avijjā). […]

Categories
Discourse Meta

The Elephant in the Dharma Hall

In February John Peacock wrote a powerful article, originally published in Tricycle (re-published with permission on SecularBuddhistNetwork) titled “The Elephant in the Dharma Hall”. (If you’ve not read, may I recommend?) The illustration is by Robert Neubecker and I thought it would make an amazing t-shirt. Neither Neubecker nor Peacock responded to the recommendation. ;)

Categories
Discourse Teaching

¿Yet Another Hindrance Talk?

Greetings, Friendlies. :) I will be assistant-teaching online with Leigh Brasington in January. He doesn’t like the hindrance talk so passed it on to me.  Thought it would be useful to give a practice talk, and I’d love for anyone and everyone to attend. I’m particularly looking for feedback: when did your eyes glaze over, […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 12, The Interpreter Module vs the Classical View of Humanity

Greetings, Friendlies. :) I hope it’s clear how far the interpreter module would take us from the Classical View of Humanity. We are working with an emergent property, a consciousness-of. Various modules/functions of the brain are doing their processing and then, as Gazzaniga says in Who’s in Charge?, “[competing] for attention and the winner emerges […]

Categories
Meta

Do Good Anyway

The Paradoxical Commandments People are illogical, unreasonable, and self-centered.Love them anyway. If you do good, people will accuse you of selfish ulterior motives.Do good anyway. If you are successful, you will win false friends and true enemies.Succeed anyway. The good you do today will be forgotten tomorrow.Do good anyway. Honesty and frankness make you vulnerable.Be […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 11.3, The Interpreter Module, Meta-Data

Greetings, Friendlies. :) Last time we pointed out that the Interpreter module is only as good as the data it receives. A hugely important thing it does not receive is meta-data about the incoming information. Michael Gazzaniga in Who’s in Charge: “The interpreter receives the results of the computations of a multitude of modules. It […]

Categories
DharmaPhD

10-Day Online Jhāna Retreat with Leigh Brasington 16-26JAN

Greetings, Friendlies, The time has come, as the walrus said. :))) I’ll be assistant-teaching with Leigh Brasington for an online 10-day Jhāna retreat 16-26JAN. Details on Leigh’s website: https://leighb.com/meditate.htm. With friendliness!

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 11.2, The Interpreter Module, Hijacked

Greetings, Friendlies, The thing about the Interpreter Module, it’s only as good as its inputs. As Gazzaniga says in Who’s In Charge, the interpreter can be hijacked. Remember back from PPP 4, Cool Avijjā Examples, the patients who did not recognize themselves in a mirror (Mirrored-Self Mis-identification)? The proposal here is that there is some […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 11, The Interpreter Module

Greetings, Friendlies! I am so excited to be writing this post. Remember a gazillion years ago when I proposed the PPP series? It was this concept, Gazzaniga’s Interpreter Module, that was the spark that lit the whole thing off. And now I finally get to tell you about it. :))) We had the classic question […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 10.2, So Many Questions

Brain Modularity and Consciousness Of. In Who’s In Charge, Gazzaniga says there is no gatekeeper to conscious experience. It’s just a plethora of subsystems, “modules”, competing for consciousness. So. Many. Questions. Your thoughts?

Categories
cognitive science Discourse Meta

PPP, Part 10, Brain Modularity and Consciousness Of

Greetings, Friendlies! In Part 8 we considered the modularity of brain organization. So what? Well, at the 50,000 foot level, if avijjā resides primarily in not understanding the kind of beings we are, then understanding brain function is a movement towards less avijjā. But let’s zoom from 50,000 to, say, 20,000 feet and ask again, […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 9, “Brain” vs “Mind”

Greetings, Friendlies. :) Taking a moment to articulate how I am understanding/using the words “brain” and “mind”. In this format I try to use the word “brain” to specifically speak about the organ of the brain. The 1.3kg mass of tissue housed inside the skull. “Mind”, on the other hand, is more loosey goosey. It […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 8, Modular Brains

Greetings, Friendlies! Coming off the highs of irreverent pāli translations, we descend into the doldrums of cognitive explication. (Not for me. I LUV this stuff. But I get that it’s not for eveyone.) So. Modular Brains. This concept came up previously in the “Viññāṇa/Consciousness Of” post. But respecting our PPP Methodology it is here broken […]