Categories
Discourse Meta

In Defense of Thinking (But Not Too Much): The Significance of Theory in Dhamma Practice

Greetings, Friendlies.:) “It’s just a theory. It doesn’t have anything to do with my practice.” Some of us have been taught that theory—anything intellectual really—is disruptive to dhammic path-ing. Theory, we have been told, actively hinders liberation. But that take, “theory is not good for practice” is itself a theory and it shapes our practice.  […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse Meta Practice

Beginning and Ending in Wonder: Neuroscience as a Companion to Practice

Greetings, Friendlies. :) For some Dhamma folk, discussions of “brain hemispheres” and “neural algorithms” elicits an instant—perhaps bodily—contraction. The resistance seems to come from a belief that the richness of human experience, the sacredness of being, is being reduced to mere mechanism. But that view is itself reductionist: “Either I must throw off the knowledge […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

Mindful, Mindfuller, Mindfullest: Prototype Theory and Clouds of Meaning

Greetings, Friendlies. :) When Martine Batchelor mentioned this book, I remember a feeling of sinking. Sadness. Disappointment. Martine asked: how can this book exist? [2] How can “mindfulness”, a term so central to dhamma, be married to something violent? We could shrug off the question, dismiss it. “Different people define words differently.” But why? And […]

Categories
Discourse

Imposter Syndrome in Dhamma Discourse

Greetings, Friendlies. :) In The Master and His Emissary Iain McGilchrist says that as the quantity of human knowledge explodes, “experts” find themselves expert on less and less. For those of us non-experts who dare approach a subject: the price may be that one is always at best an interested outsider, at worst an interloper condemned […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse Scholarship

Awakening Then, Awakening Now

Greetings, Friendlies. :) As an extension on last week’s OG-awakening-as-recorded-in-the-Suttanipata, I’d like to highlight a sliver from Rob Burbea’s 2019 “Stream Entry – Conceptions, Value and Realisation“. [1] Burbea describes the entire body of Gotama’s teachings as “set within the cosmology of rebirth”. He invites us to suspend our current operating frame and submit, in […]

Categories
Discourse Scholarship

Gotama’s Awakening in the Sutta Piṭaka of the Pāli Canon

Greetings, Friendlies. :) With all this talk of awakening, I should probably check with the OG; what do the suttas have to say about Gotama’s awakening? [1] I was surprised not to find a definitive list of all the mentions of G’s awakening in the Sutta and/or Vinaya Piṭaka. If you know of such a […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

Alan Watts, Iain McGilchrist, and Awakening, Part 4, Equating Attentions

Greetings, Friendlies. Shall we play a little What If? Hypothetically. We could then say that Watts’ mystic, an awakened being, is one who has become fully aware of, who dwells in, McGilchrist’s Right Hemisphere “context”, Right Hemisphere “view”. I mean… what if??? With friendliness!

Categories
Discourse

Alan Watts, Iain McGilchrist, and Awakening, Part 3, Watts’ “Mystic”

Greetings, Friendlies! In The Tao of Philosophy [1] Watts says, “People, who by various methods become fully aware of their floodlight consciousness, have what is called ‘a mystical experience,’ or what the Buddhists call bodhi, an awakening. …they discover that the real deep, deep self, that which you really are fundamentally and forever, is the […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

Alan Watts, Iain McGilchrist, and Awakening, Part 2, McGilchrist and the Attentions

Greetings, Friendlies. :) In The Master and His Emissary Iain McGilchrist says that one explanation of why hemisphere lateralization arose is the evolutionary advantage to a single organism having two types of attention. One attention is focused, capable of discerning objects from their background, breaking things into parts. This attention dwells in the left hemisphere. […]

Categories
Discourse

Alan Watts, Iain McGilchrist, and Awakening, Part 1, Watts and the Attentions

Greetings, Friendlies. :) Alan Watts differentiates between what he calls “spotlight” and “floodlight” attention (he sometimes uses the terms “awareness” or “consciousness”. Standardizing to “attention” for now). Spotlight attention, just like it sounds, is a narrow beam of intense attention. It picks things out. You can imagine standing in a dark room using a bright, […]

Categories
Discourse

Subjective Experiences of Awakening, Part 5, Kitaro Nishida

Greetings, Friendlies. :) Writing this series I was reminded of a quote from Kitaro Nishida (which I got from Leigh Brasington and he thinks it’s from the book The Nothingness Beyond God but I haven’t gotten a copy from the library yet, so check your facts). Pure experience is the beginning of Zen. It is […]

Categories
Discourse Scholarship

Subjective Experiences of Awakening, Part 4, Filling Out the Range

Greetings, Friendlies! (Parts 1, 2, 3.) The sense I have, and I could be very wrong about this, is that between Watts and Buddhadāsa we have a range encompassing all the other versions of awakening I’ve heard. In Ingram’s list, for example, the Psychological Models and the Nothing to Do Schools fall into Buddhadāsa’s range. […]

Categories
Discourse Scholarship

Subjective Experiences of Awakening, Part 3, Buddhadāsa Bhikkhu

Greetings, Friendlies. :) (Part 1, Part 2.) Quick refresh: we are looking at subjective experiences of awakening. Last time Alan Watts’ This is It. This time Buddhadāsa Bhikkhu’s Nibbāna For Everyone. Buddhadāsa speaks of a “Nibbāna instinct”, a drive egging us to find relief from the irritation of craving and aversion. [1] I think B […]

Categories
Discourse

Subjective Experiences of Awakening, Part 1, Framing

Greetings, Friendlies. :) We ended the Pile of Provisional Positions with a hypothesis that Gotama’s awakening had neurological correlates, specifically a shift from Left-Hemisphere-Dominant-Experience to Right-Hemisphere-Dominant-Experience. That’s great, and, it leans a little objective. What about the subjective experience of awakening? I don’t know how it goes for other folk, but for me, the first […]

Categories
Discourse Meta Teaching

On Writing to Learn

Greetings, Friendlies. :) They say that the best way to learn is to teach. Perhaps. But what do we get from teaching? And are there alternatives? I’d say that the most important thing we get from teaching is learning to refine our ideas. We root around and gather up the vague hints and notions lurking […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse Meta

Tiny Book Club

Greetings, Friendlies! For years I’ve threatened to host a book club bringing Dhamma folks together to read non-Dhamma books. Particularly CogScience-y books. The dream is manifest. Behold: Tiny Book Club! Just two people, just one book. For the first iteration kalyana-Darrell and I will read Iain McGilchrist’s The Master and His Emissary, a substantial tome […]

Categories
Discourse Meta

PPP, Part 27, That’s All Folks! (kind of…)

Well, friendlies, we made it. Congratulations. :))) Over the past 27(ish) posts we’ve looked at the Classical View of Humanity, the Interpreter Module, Avijjā, Simple Knowing, Skillfulness, Reactivity, Fabrication, Implicit Bias, Hemisphere Specialization, and the Goal of the Practice. The “Survival Series for Kids” authors would be proud of us, I think. Not that we’re […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse Practice Teaching

PPP, Part 26, The Goal of the Practice, Awakening, Hemisphere Lateralization?

Greetings, Friendlies. :) It is my understanding reading the suttas that all this bhāvanā stuff, this eightfold path stuff, does in fact have a goal. Awakening. Bodhi-pattī. I have not, however, found a satisfyingly simple answer to the question, “What is awakening?” Some will say this is because there is not a satisfyingly simple answer […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 25, Hemisphere Specialization

Greetings, Friendlies. :) Hemisphere Specialization. The idea that the left and right brain hemispheres have different structural and functional roles, and that these differences are manifest in our lived experience. You’ve probably heard this kind of thing before: “artists are right-brained, analysts are left-brained”. That’s actually not accurate, that artists are right-brained and analysts are […]

Categories
Discourse Scholarship

PPP, Part 24, Avijjā Revisited

Greetings, Friendlies. :) Just before the PPP, I wrote about Avijjā (mis-understanding) as the polestar of practice and offered an interpretation of the term. Though the general shape is the same I’d like to offer today’s, maybe more nuanced(?), understanding: First: the concept of Avijjā is empty. How we understand it at any point depends […]

Categories
Discourse

PPP, Part 23, Implicit Bias

Greetings, Friendlies. :) Is a post on Implicit Bias superfluous? (Is opening a blog post with a rhetorical question superfluous?) Everyone knows what Implicit Bias is. And it’s clear how it ties in with the interpreter module and the construction of human experience. Right? I dunno. There was a time when I wouldn’t have used […]

Categories
Discourse

PPP, Part 22, Angry-Femme IM and the Threefold Training

Greetings, Friendlies! Last time I TMI’d you with the Angry-Femme Interpreter Module. Thanks for holding that. :) Re-mixing the same with the Reactivity and Threefold Training stuff from Part 19. The angry-feminist view has been known to cause a ruckus. Even when not manifesting behaviorally, it can lead to a lot of internal dukkha. Hypervigilance, […]

Categories
Discourse

PPP, Part 21, My Angry-Femme Interpreter Module, An Introduction

Greetings, Friendlies! Last time we looked at how the Interpreter Module (IM) uses not just individual pieces of information but also views and narratives when constructing the world. My IM wears some pretty thick angry-feminist goggles. And fair enough. I’m 5’4 (162cm), small framed, and for many decades, kind of adorable. I’ve worked in construction, […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 20, DhP 1:1 and the Interpreter Module

Greetings, Friendlies. :) All experience is preceded by the Interpreter ModuleLed by the Interpreter ModuleMade by the Interpreter Module#FakeBuddhaQuotes Imagine: you have volunteered for a scientific study. You arrive at the lab and the affable experimenter explains they are studying social interactions. They would like to apply theatrical makeup to your right cheek, in such […]

Categories
Discourse

PPP, Part 17, Saṅkhāra-ing? Fabricating?

Greetings, Friendlies. :) I notice I’ve started using the word “Fabricating”, which I inherited from Rob Burbea. I think (though I’m not certain) he’s talking about the fact of our minds fabricating/constructing experience, from the grossest levels of full-blown papanca all the way down to the subtlest levels of subconscious conceptualizing. And I think this […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 16, Simple Knowing, The Interpreter Module, Saṅkhāra-ing/Fabrication

Greetings, Friendlies. :) Following on from our description of Simple Knowing… In The Social Brain (and in Who’s In Charge?) Gazzaniga recounts an experience illustrating the interpreter module doing its thing on top of basic sensory input. We might say Saṅkhāra-ing/Fabrication in action. Remember how, for Split-Brain Patients, you can present information to one hemisphere […]

Categories
cognitive science DharmaPhD Discourse Practice

PPP, Part 15, Simple Knowing

Greetings, Friendlies. :) In some dhamma traditions a type of bhavana (cultivation/meditation) is practiced that goes by names like Bare Attention, Open Awareness, Choiceless Awareness. Presently I prefer Christina Feldman’s “Simple Knowing”. From her book Mindfulness: a way of attending where no judgment or narrative is added to the experience of the moment. A thought […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 14, The Interpreter Module, Questions

Greetings, Friendlies! Though enormously enthusiastic about the idea of an Interpreter Module, there are plenty of unanswered questions. I present these as-is, as placeholders and acknowledgment of the current state of my understanding: And there we are. Your thoughts? Other questions/concerns?

Categories
cognitive science DharmaPhD Discourse

PPP, Part 13, Interpreter Module, Avijjā, Saṅkhāra

Greetings, Friendlies. :) What happens if we take the Interpreter Module, Avijjā (as mis-understanding how our minds work), and Saṅkhāra (as “principle of construction“), and puzzle-piece them together? At least one arrangement gives us an Interpreter Module which is receiving information that is, at best, limited and conditioned, at worst, inaccurate or grossly incomplete (Avijjā). […]

Categories
cognitive science Discourse

PPP, Part 12, The Interpreter Module vs the Classical View of Humanity

Greetings, Friendlies. :) I hope it’s clear how far the interpreter module would take us from the Classical View of Humanity. We are working with an emergent property, a consciousness-of. Various modules/functions of the brain are doing their processing and then, as Gazzaniga says in Who’s in Charge?, “[competing] for attention and the winner emerges […]