But, Shannon, isn’t Hemisphere Lateralization just a handy reframe for neuroscience-junkies? I’m glad you asked. :) We’ve already considered HemLat as a powerful explanatory model. But if that were all it offered it might sit—more or less comfortably—alongside other dhammic explanations. For example, I once told a teacher on retreat that I was nauseous and […]
Category: cognitive science
Greetings, Friendlies.:) All experience is preceded by mind,Led by mind,Made by mind. ~DhP 1.1 Translation by Gil Fronsdal Well, almost. It appears experience is shaped, not by mind, but by minds. Two of them. And those two minds are conditioned by the left and right hemispheres of the brain. To truncate E.B. White: We are […]
Greetings, Friendlies.:) In Western Dhamma we have a tendency to atomize—to part-out—spiritual traditions: take what is useful and leave the rest. This is an incredible privilege. But it can leave a practitioner adrift, yearning for a coherent sense of meaning. Having collected various bits of Dhamma—and they are each immensely helpful: apply this bit here, […]
Greetings, Friendlies.:) Have you ever noticed how some parts of you want to deeply engage with the world—and other parts want to control it? Classically we might identify the one as a kind of Buddha-nature and the other as the work of Māra. McGilchrist’s view of hemisphere lateralization [1] suggests that these two views of […]
Greetings, Friendlies. :) For some Dhamma folk, discussions of “brain hemispheres” and “neural algorithms” elicits an instant—perhaps bodily—contraction. The resistance seems to come from a belief that the richness of human experience, the sacredness of being, is being reduced to mere mechanism. But that view is itself reductionist: “Either I must throw off the knowledge […]
Greetings, friendlies. :) Ever been on retreat, maybe the teacher is talking about dependent origination, and the frustration is clear in the tone of the Q&A: “Wait. Is Saṅkhāra a kind of Saññā?” “Is Citta Viññāṇa??” “How is Vedanā different from Nāmarūpa???” It seems to me that a lot of dukkha in dhamma teachings stems […]
Greetings, Friendlies. :) When Martine Batchelor mentioned this book, I remember a feeling of sinking. Sadness. Disappointment. Martine asked: how can this book exist? [2] How can “mindfulness”, a term so central to dhamma, be married to something violent? We could shrug off the question, dismiss it. “Different people define words differently.” But why? And […]
Greetings, Friendlies. :) As an extension on last week’s OG-awakening-as-recorded-in-the-Suttanipata, I’d like to highlight a sliver from Rob Burbea’s 2019 “Stream Entry – Conceptions, Value and Realisation“. [1] Burbea describes the entire body of Gotama’s teachings as “set within the cosmology of rebirth”. He invites us to suspend our current operating frame and submit, in […]
Greetings, Friendlies. Shall we play a little What If? Hypothetically. We could then say that Watts’ mystic, an awakened being, is one who has become fully aware of, who dwells in, McGilchrist’s Right Hemisphere “context”, Right Hemisphere “view”. I mean… what if??? With friendliness!
Greetings, Friendlies. :) In The Master and His Emissary Iain McGilchrist says that one explanation of why hemisphere lateralization arose is the evolutionary advantage to a single organism having two types of attention. One attention is focused, capable of discerning objects from their background, breaking things into parts. This attention dwells in the left hemisphere. […]
Categories
Tiny Book Club
Greetings, Friendlies! For years I’ve threatened to host a book club bringing Dhamma folks together to read non-Dhamma books. Particularly CogScience-y books. The dream is manifest. Behold: Tiny Book Club! Just two people, just one book. For the first iteration kalyana-Darrell and I will read Iain McGilchrist’s The Master and His Emissary, a substantial tome […]
Greetings, Friendlies. :) It is my understanding reading the suttas that all this bhāvanā stuff, this eightfold path stuff, does in fact have a goal. Awakening. Bodhi-pattī. I have not, however, found a satisfyingly simple answer to the question, “What is awakening?” Some will say this is because there is not a satisfyingly simple answer […]
Greetings, Friendlies. :) Hemisphere Specialization. The idea that the left and right brain hemispheres have different structural and functional roles, and that these differences are manifest in our lived experience. You’ve probably heard this kind of thing before: “artists are right-brained, analysts are left-brained”. That’s actually not accurate, that artists are right-brained and analysts are […]
Greetings, Friendlies. :) All experience is preceded by the Interpreter ModuleLed by the Interpreter ModuleMade by the Interpreter Module#FakeBuddhaQuotes Imagine: you have volunteered for a scientific study. You arrive at the lab and the affable experimenter explains they are studying social interactions. They would like to apply theatrical makeup to your right cheek, in such […]
Greetings, Friendlies! Could it be that Skillfulness, at least in some part, is an overcoming of reactivity? “Reactivity” is not a translation of a Pāli word, so less concern about heresy; was Stephen Batchelor the first to use it in a dhammic sense? Dunno. It might be useful at times to differentiate between neuro-biological reactivity […]
Greetings, Friendlies. :) Following on from our description of Simple Knowing… In The Social Brain (and in Who’s In Charge?) Gazzaniga recounts an experience illustrating the interpreter module doing its thing on top of basic sensory input. We might say Saṅkhāra-ing/Fabrication in action. Remember how, for Split-Brain Patients, you can present information to one hemisphere […]
Greetings, Friendlies. :) In some dhamma traditions a type of bhavana (cultivation/meditation) is practiced that goes by names like Bare Attention, Open Awareness, Choiceless Awareness. Presently I prefer Christina Feldman’s “Simple Knowing”. From her book Mindfulness: a way of attending where no judgment or narrative is added to the experience of the moment. A thought […]
Greetings, Friendlies! Though enormously enthusiastic about the idea of an Interpreter Module, there are plenty of unanswered questions. I present these as-is, as placeholders and acknowledgment of the current state of my understanding: And there we are. Your thoughts? Other questions/concerns?
Greetings, Friendlies. :) What happens if we take the Interpreter Module, Avijjā (as mis-understanding how our minds work), and Saṅkhāra (as “principle of construction“), and puzzle-piece them together? At least one arrangement gives us an Interpreter Module which is receiving information that is, at best, limited and conditioned, at worst, inaccurate or grossly incomplete (Avijjā). […]
Greetings, Friendlies. :) I hope it’s clear how far the interpreter module would take us from the Classical View of Humanity. We are working with an emergent property, a consciousness-of. Various modules/functions of the brain are doing their processing and then, as Gazzaniga says in Who’s in Charge?, “[competing] for attention and the winner emerges […]
Greetings, Friendlies. :) Last time we pointed out that the Interpreter module is only as good as the data it receives. A hugely important thing it does not receive is meta-data about the incoming information. Michael Gazzaniga in Who’s in Charge: “The interpreter receives the results of the computations of a multitude of modules. It […]
Greetings, Friendlies, The thing about the Interpreter Module, it’s only as good as its inputs. As Gazzaniga says in Who’s In Charge, the interpreter can be hijacked. Remember back from PPP 4, Cool Avijjā Examples, the patients who did not recognize themselves in a mirror (Mirrored-Self Mis-identification)? The proposal here is that there is some […]
Greetings, Friendlies! I am so excited to be writing this post. Remember a gazillion years ago when I proposed the PPP series? It was this concept, Gazzaniga’s Interpreter Module, that was the spark that lit the whole thing off. And now I finally get to tell you about it. :))) We had the classic question […]
Brain Modularity and Consciousness Of. In Who’s In Charge, Gazzaniga says there is no gatekeeper to conscious experience. It’s just a plethora of subsystems, “modules”, competing for consciousness. So. Many. Questions. Your thoughts?
Greetings, Friendlies! In Part 8 we considered the modularity of brain organization. So what? Well, at the 50,000 foot level, if avijjā resides primarily in not understanding the kind of beings we are, then understanding brain function is a movement towards less avijjā. But let’s zoom from 50,000 to, say, 20,000 feet and ask again, […]
Greetings, Friendlies. :) Taking a moment to articulate how I am understanding/using the words “brain” and “mind”. In this format I try to use the word “brain” to specifically speak about the organ of the brain. The 1.3kg mass of tissue housed inside the skull. “Mind”, on the other hand, is more loosey goosey. It […]
Greetings, Friendlies! Coming off the highs of irreverent pāli translations, we descend into the doldrums of cognitive explication. (Not for me. I LUV this stuff. But I get that it’s not for eveyone.) So. Modular Brains. This concept came up previously in the “Viññāṇa/Consciousness Of” post. But respecting our PPP Methodology it is here broken […]
Greetings, Friendlies! Last time we looked at some rather extraordinary examples of avijjā, of not understanding how our minds work. This time I’d like to share a case that struck me quite strongly, precisely because it was so much closer to home than the others. This case covered a former Johns Hopkins (JHU) student. She […]
Greetings, Friendlies! Following on from Pile of Provisional Positions 3, about the Classical View of Humanity, and the idea of Avijjā as not understanding how our minds work… In the two semesters I studied Cognitive Science at Johns Hopkins, the course that most blew my mind (and this is a high bar) was Cognitive Neuropsychology. […]
Greetings, Friendlies! I harbor some baseless supposition (BS?) that classical dhamma education unfolds via a structure honed over, perhaps, several thousand years? Theories and practices presented in an order and at a pace curated and refined for generations. Practical. Reproducible. Safe. I have not been the beneficiary (or victim) of such a system; coming up […]
Dharma PhD 